​Let’s talk about something most of us don’t think about until it’s too late: how you lock your phone. You’ve probably heard that using your fingerprint or face to unlock your device is fast and convenient—and it is. But when it comes to protecting your privacy using a password or PIN might actually be the safer bet.

Here’s the thing: the laws around phones and privacy are still catching up with the technology. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect you from unreasonable searches and seizures. That means the police can’t just go snooping through your stuff without a warrant. But phones are tricky. Courts have generally said that yes, your phone is protected and they usually need a warrant to search it. But what happens when they get that warrant, or think they don’t need one?

This is where the Fifth Amendment comes in—the one that says you can’t be forced to testify against yourself. Courts have decided that a password or PIN falls under that protection. It’s something you know, and you can’t be forced to give it up. But biometrics? Your fingerprint or face? That’s something you are. And legally, it’s more like handing over a key than giving up a secret. In many cases, police can make you use your face or finger to unlock your phone without it being considered "testifying."

So even though it’s easier to just glance at your phone to unlock it, that convenience could cost you if you ever end up in a legal situation. Whether you're a protester, journalist, or just someone who values your privacy, using a PIN or passcode adds a layer of protection that biometrics can’t. In the eyes of the law, knowing your code is very different from having a fingerprint.
​
Until the courts set clearer rules, the safest move is to stick with a good old-fashioned password. It might take a few extra seconds to type it in, but that small hassle could be what keeps your private life out of someone else's hands.

​Picking out a new smartphone can feel overwhelming with so many choices, brands, and plans to navigate. But it really boils down to figuring out what matters most to you—without overpaying for features you'll never use.

First things first: think about how you actually use your phone. Are you snapping a million photos, streaming Netflix constantly, or just sending texts and occasionally checking social media? If you're into photography or videos, something like an iPhone or a higher-end Samsung Galaxy might be worth the investment. On the other hand, if you're just texting your family or making calls, a more affordable phone from Motorola or Google Pixel's budget lines will do just fine.

Considering your available providers is always important. Around here, you've got Verizon, US Cellular, T-Mobile, and Cricket. Verizon's coverage is rock-solid almost everywhere you go, especially handy if you're traveling outside city limits often. But they do tend to charge premium prices for their reliability. US Cellular offers good regional coverage and more personal customer service, but their national coverage can be spotty if you're frequently on the move. T-Mobile gives you a nice balance: generally lower prices, decent nationwide coverage, and great perks like streaming bundles. Cricket, owned by AT&T, usually has attractive plans without too many strings attached, perfect if you're budget-conscious but still want good coverage.

Then there’s the option of something like Tracfone, which can save you a ton of cash if you're not constantly glued to your phone. The upside? No contracts, cheap prepaid plans, and a lot of flexibility. The downside? Customer support can be tough to non-existent, and data can run out quickly if you're streaming a lot. Plus, if you're someone who loves to upgrade your phone frequently or relies heavily on fast mobile data, a prepaid service might feel restrictive.

In the end, choose a phone and plan based on your real-life habits—not just what's trendy. Match that to a provider that aligns with your budget and lifestyle, and you'll end up happier in the long run.